FourFour2 FourFour Two The British and US intelligence agencies are engaged in the same kind of thing: They are trying to understand what intelligence it is the other has, and they are trying both to understand and to exploit that intelligence.

They are working in very similar ways.

And what they have done is to use that understanding to influence their own governments in ways that are very harmful, that are deeply destructive.

And it is a very dangerous process.

It has not stopped.

 They both need to do what they are supposed to do, which is to be a partner, to cooperate.

And this is why they are working together.

One of the things that we are seeing, particularly as we look at the role of the UK in this, is that they are, in fact, the UK.

The British Intelligence and Security Committee has a very good track record of trying to get these kinds of investigations done.

They have been very effective in getting them done, and in a way that the American agencies have been less successful in getting done.

And the British have been successful in working with them to produce a number of documents that are of great value to the US intelligence community.

They have produced an enormous number of reports that have been useful to both countries.

In terms of the other intelligence agencies, it is not a question of them having the capacity to make these assessments.

It is not an issue of them being able to do it.

It was always going to be hard to work with the UK and the US, because they have different national security interests.

They share very similar views on the nature of the threat.

The UK intelligence services have an important interest in the relationship with the US.

And there is a relationship that exists in the intelligence community that they have a very strong interest in, which we have been able to see.

And in terms of their relationship with Washington, I think it is an important relationship, because it gives them an opportunity to work together and have that understanding of the world, to see what the other side thinks, and to have a chance to use those shared views.

So I think that is a pretty good relationship.

I am quite certain that there is an element of that in Britain.

They see the US as a great power, and the UK sees the US with an interest in maintaining the balance of power, in ensuring that they maintain a global order.

They both have a interest in making sure that they keep their relationships with the other countries, in preserving them.

And it does provide a sort of a framework for the sharing of intelligence and the sharing and the understanding of intelligence.

It has been good for them both, and it has been very good for us as well.

We all recognise that this is a complex relationship.

I think there are some areas in which it has not been a very successful partnership.

There are areas where we have seen intelligence that has been of very low value.

We have seen the sharing in areas that we know are not really of great interest.

But there are areas of which there is some mutual understanding and that has made a huge difference.

There are areas in the world that we would not have believed to exist in the 1950s, when the US was very powerful, where it is very much the case that there are very high-value targets, for example, in China and Pakistan.

And we have taken a lot of steps to try to support those relationships.

We will not go into detail on this, but we do think it has made an enormous difference.

It has made it more difficult for us to be attacked.

We are not going to make the same mistake in this respect.

We will be talking to senior members of the intelligence services, and we will also be talking with members of other agencies and with other governments and with different governments, about what we need to be doing to make sure that we do not have to make such compromises again.