“This is an issue that’s been around for a while,” says Dr. Susan Hargrove, who is one of the researchers involved in the study.

“It’s very important that dogs be able to read, and we have to be vigilant about how to keep them safe.”

Dr. Hargrogve is a co-author on the study and a senior scientist with the University of Minnesota.

Her team, which includes dogs from Minnesota, Oregon and Canada, was studying how dogs respond to various cues from humans.

One key is their ability to learn new behaviors.

In the study, they wanted to determine whether the dogs’ ability to recognize a certain tone and visual pattern of an object could predict the type of behavior they would exhibit.

In particular, the researchers wanted to know if the dogs could identify objects in their environment that would prompt them to act in a specific manner, such as turning or climbing up a ladder.

The researchers also wanted to see how the dogs reacted to the different tones and patterns of the sound produced by human speech.

The dogs were trained to play a game called “Dirty Rotten Scrap,” in which the team had the dogs play a video game where they could pick up a certain object.

The dog would then either pick up the object or throw it.

The object was placed on the floor, and the dog would try to retrieve it.

If the dog failed to retrieve the object, the dog was punished for misjudging whether the object was in its reach.

The experiment was designed to test the dogs ability to discriminate between objects in different environments.

Dr. Anne Schuster, a professor of behavioral sciences at the University at Buffalo who was not involved in any of the research, said it was clear that dogs were able to detect objects in certain locations.

“We know that they are able to pick up objects in a certain location and recognize them as objects,” Dr. Schuster says.

“That doesn’t mean they can recognize objects in all environments.”

The researchers wanted the dogs to be able recognize a tone or visual pattern in a speech clip, and to differentiate between objects that were visible or invisible, as well as objects that would be visible to humans and invisible to the dogs.

To test this, the scientists trained the dogs with the sounds of two different types of speech clips.

One was played by a person who was speaking with a dog, and another by a dog that was not speaking.

The video clips included different tones, such that the sounds were either calm or angry.

In each clip, the tone was either neutral or a combination of the two tones.

The first tone, for example, was neutral and would sound like the sounds a dog makes when it sees a person.

The second tone, on the other hand, was angry and would be heard as a dog’s bark.

The scientists wanted to get the dogs used to these sounds, and also to see if they would learn how to distinguish between different sounds in the context of the speech clip.

“The first part of the study was designed with dogs, so it was kind of a trial and error,” Dr Hargrov said.

“But I thought that it was very important for the dogs, and they were able.

The tone that they were hearing, that was the tone that would tell them to do something.”

After a short period of time, the dogs were tested in a new environment.

In this new environment, they were asked to pick a target object, which they could either pick with their noses or their paws.

When the target object was removed from the environment, the team was also asked to mark the object by placing a sticker on the object.

In both situations, the stickers were placed on different objects in the environment.

Then the dogs learned how to recognize the different stickers and mark the target.

After the dogs had been tested for several days, the training session was repeated.

The team then tested the dogs again, this time with the object that they had not yet been tested on.

In these tests, the objects were removed from their environment, and then they were tested with the objects that they still had in their new environment: the target and the stickers.

In a third experiment, the same researchers trained the same group of dogs with two different objects: a stick with a human’s hand and a stick without.

The human’s hands were placed next to the object and the dogs saw a series of pictures that had a human hand holding an object and a human object with a different hand.

When a human had the object with the human hand and had the human object held in his or her hand, the human would move his or herself around in the same pattern as the dog.

The same pattern would be seen with the stick without the human and with the sticks with the hand and with human objects with the hands.

After a few days, a new set of objects was placed in the laboratory