AI experts have been warning for years that artificial intelligence could one day become a powerful weapon in warfare.

And now they’re about to find out just how much of an advantage it could have.

The Pentagon is set to announce a big change to its intelligence policy, codenamed Intelligence, that will dramatically shift the way the U.S. is used to dealing with the threat of AI.

It’s not an imminent change.

But the new policy will come into force sometime next year.

For now, though, there’s still no way to predict how the new regime will impact the war on terror.

To be clear, it will be up to the Pentagon to decide how it will address the new threat.

And for now, the Trump administration is going to continue to treat intelligence as a tool of war.

“We need to understand what we’re dealing with,” said David A. Petraeus, who led the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2005 to 2013, when he was the director of national intelligence.

“That’s the essence of intelligence.

Intelligence is not about winning a war, it’s about understanding what the enemy is doing.”

That’s a fundamental difference from what the Obama administration, during the Obama era, considered intelligence.

That approach focused on intelligence, not on warfare.

As Petraeus told The Washington Post in January, “The goal is to get them to do something, and to understand their motivation.

Intelligence matters, but it doesn’t have to be decisive.”

The new policy, as outlined in a new memorandum by Gen. John F. Kelly, the head of U.N. forces, and General Joseph Votel, the former head of the CIA, would have a major impact on intelligence gathering.

The memo is titled “The War on Terror: A Strategy for Intelligence.”

It calls for using intelligence to “improve operational efficiency and lethality” while also “strengthening the United States’ capacity to conduct foreign policy, counter terrorism, counter narcotics, and counter proliferation activities.”

That means more intelligence, more information, and more information being shared with allies and other countries.

It also would mean a reduction in the amount of time intelligence analysts have to focus on warfighting, and an increase in the number of hours they can spend working on intelligence collection.

As part of the policy, the administration also would stop providing military and intelligence assistance to foreign countries that use their intelligence capabilities to wage war, which would make it easier for the U,S.

to focus its intelligence efforts on defeating the Islamic State and other terrorist groups.

The policy would also require that U.s. intelligence agencies report regularly on the use of intelligence to support counter-terrorism efforts.

It would also force U.n. intelligence and defense agencies to cooperate with the Pentagon on counter-narcotics operations.

In a separate document, Kelly said that the Trump-era policy would allow the U-S.

“to make the strongest possible use of our intelligence capabilities” to fight the Islamic States.

That includes “enhancing the operational efficiency of our counterterrorism operations, and reducing the risk of inadvertent use of information to advance counterterrorism goals.”

Kelly and Votels policy also would expand the U.-S.

drone war to include targets in areas with “near certainty” the use will have a “direct or indirect” impact on American lives.

Kelly said the policy would enable the U to conduct more targeted drone strikes against suspected terrorist groups and other groups.

And the policy also calls for more U.o.S.-led airstrikes against the Islamic Front in Iraq, which Kelly called the “most dangerous and violent group in the world.”

The policy also includes “providing more training to local partners to support our counterterrorism efforts.”

The strategy also includes new restrictions on the intelligence community and the Defense Department.

The White House has been pushing for more intelligence sharing, including sharing intelligence about potential terrorist attacks with allies, even though some intelligence analysts believe such sharing is counterproductive.

In May, President Donald Trump said he believed the intelligence sharing system to be working well.

“I think it’s working, because we’re having a good relationship with some of the partners, with the intelligence communities, with all of the allies,” he said.

“They are doing a very good job.”

But the policy is also going to make it harder for U. S. intelligence to work closely with allies to defeat terrorist groups like the Islamic Republic of Iran.

“If we don’t share intelligence with our allies, and if we don�t share information with the U., and if there�s no meaningful intelligence sharing with the allies, then we’re going to be able to get very little out of that information,” said Richard Clarke, who served as the acting director of the National Counterterrorism Center under President George W. Bush.

The new rules will also make it much more difficult for the Pentagon and intelligence agencies to work together to prevent future terrorist attacks.

The administration is also pushing for the use more